Audi TT 1999 vs Chrysler Sebring 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 262 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Audi TT engine produces 23 HP less power than Chrysler Sebring, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Chrysler Sebring. Despite less power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 10.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Sebring engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Seat Ibiza, Seat Leon | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Chrysler 300M, Dodge Intrepid | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Sebring might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Audi TT 1999 1.8 engine: The engine is considered reliable, with a lifespan from 300,000 km.
The primary causes of unstable operation include air leaks through the crankcase ventilation system, throttle body malfunctions, idle air ... More about Audi TT 1999 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.40 m | |
| Audi TT is 88 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi TT is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 320 litres | |
|
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage space. Audi TT has 100 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 1 metres less than that of the Chrysler Sebring, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`640 kg | 1`990 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`340 kg | 1`585 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 300 kg | 405 kg | |
| Audi TT load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 35 procentiem less than Chrysler Sebring. Therefore, Chrysler Sebring is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |