Audi TT 1999 vs Chevrolet Camaro 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Audi TT engine produces 13 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. Despite less power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 12.4 | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi TT consumes 4.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 630 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 610 km on highway | ||
| Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Camaro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Audi TT 1999 1.8 engine: The engine is considered reliable, with a lifespan from 300,000 km.
The primary causes of unstable operation include air leaks through the crankcase ventilation system, throttle body malfunctions, idle air ... More about Audi TT 1999 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Audi TT is smaller, but higher. Audi TT is 87 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 1.6 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Camaro, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |