Audi TT 2010 vs Audi TT 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Audi TT 2010) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Audi TT 1999) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Audi TT 2010 is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT 2010 engine produces 10 HP less power than Audi TT 1999, but torque is 115 NM more than Audi TT 1999. Despite less power, Audi TT 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 9.5 | |
|
The Audi TT 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi TT 2010 consumes 4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT 1999, which means that by driving the Audi TT 2010 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 600 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Audi TT 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3, Skoda Superb | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Seat Ibiza, Seat Leon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi TT 2010 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Audi TT 1999 1.8 engine: The engine is considered reliable, with a lifespan from 300,000 km.
The primary causes of unstable operation include air leaks through the crankcase ventilation system, throttle body malfunctions, idle air ... More about Audi TT 1999 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Audi TT 2010 is larger. Audi TT 2010 is 15 cm longer than the Audi TT 1999, 8 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 220 litres | |
|
Audi TT 2010 has more luggage capacity. Audi TT 2010 has 30 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT 1999. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT 2010 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Audi TT 1999, which means Audi TT 2010 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`735 | 1`765 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Audi TT 2010 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi TT 1999 has serious deffects in 485 percent more cases than Audi TT 2010, so Audi TT 2010 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | no data | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Audi TT has
| |