Audi Q7 2009 vs Ford Ranger 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Audi Q7 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q7 engine produces 97 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 220 NM more than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Audi Q7 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 8.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Q7 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi Q7 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q7 consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Audi Q7 is larger, but slightly lower. Audi Q7 is 1 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 18 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q7 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 775 litres | 1500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2035 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Audi Q7 has 725 litres less trunk space than the Ford Ranger. This could mean that the Audi Q7 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q7 is 1 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Audi Q7 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 3`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 600 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q7 has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |