Audi Q7 2009 vs Volvo XC90 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Audi Q7 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC90 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC90 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 5.9 | 2.4 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 - 500 HP | 163 - 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 - 1000 NM | 320 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.5 - 9.1 seconds | 9.5 - 11.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 12.7 | 8.1 - 11.5 | |
|
Audi Q7 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90. On average, Audi Q7 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 205 - 240 mm (8.1 - 9.4 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Audi Q7 is larger, but lower. Audi Q7 is 28 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 5 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q7 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 775 litres | 600 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2035 litres | 1837 litres | |
|
Audi Q7 has more luggage capacity. Audi Q7 has 175 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q7 (by 198 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q7 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Audi Q7 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`123 | ~ 2`718 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 600 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q7 has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |