Audi Q5 2013 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q5 engine produces 50 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Audi Q5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Q5 consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi Q5 could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q5 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A5 | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.71 m | |
| Audi Q5 is 1 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 8 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q5 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1560 litres | 1877 litres | |
| Audi Q5 has 10 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 317 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q5 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Audi Q5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`330 | 2`320 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Audi Q5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Audi Q5, so Audi Q5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 26 800 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q5 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |