Audi Q3 2018 vs Renault Kadjar 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q3 engine produces 74 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Renault Kadjar. Thanks to more power Audi Q3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A6, Audi A5, Audi Q5 | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kadjar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Audi Q3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Kadjar 2018 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Kadjar 2018 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi Q3 and Renault Kadjar are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1525 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Audi Q3 has more luggage capacity. Audi Q3 has 58 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q3 (by 47 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`280 | 1`994 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Audi Q3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kadjar has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Audi Q3, so Audi Q3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 28 400 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q3 has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |