Audi Q3 2018 vs Renault Kadjar 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Audi Q3 engine produces 40 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Renault Kadjar. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A6, Audi A5, Audi Q5 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kadjar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi Q3 and Renault Kadjar are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1525 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Audi Q3 has more luggage capacity. Audi Q3 has 58 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q3 (by 47 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`280 | 2`139 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Audi Q3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kadjar has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Audi Q3, so Audi Q3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 30 400 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q3 has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |