Audi Q3 2018 vs Renault Kadjar 2015

 
Audi Q3
2018 - 2020
Renault Kadjar
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.5 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 190 HP110 HP
Torque: 400 NM260 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8 seconds11.7 seconds
Audi Q3 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi Q3 engine produces 80 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Renault Kadjar. Thanks to more power Audi Q3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.6no data
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Engines

Engine production duration: 10 years13 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A6, Audi A5, Audi Q5Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kadjar might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Audi Q3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Renault Kadjar 2015 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ...  More about Renault Kadjar 2015 1.5 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.45 m
Width: 1.86 m1.84 m
Height: 1.62 m1.61 m
Both cars are similar in size. Audi Q3 is 4 cm longer than the Renault Kadjar, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 530 litres472 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1525 litres1478 litres
Audi Q3 has more luggage capacity.
Audi Q3 has 58 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q3 (by 47 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`2801`943
Safety:
Audi Q3 scores higher in safety tests, but Renault Kadjar is better rated in child safety tests. The Audi Q3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
high

above average
Audi Q3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kadjar has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Audi Q3, so Audi Q3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 31 20010 800
Pros and Cons: Audi Q3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
Renault Kadjar has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher children safety
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv