Audi A5 2016 vs Mazda 6 2018
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 445 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Audi A5 is more dynamic to drive. Audi A5 engine produces 6 HP more power than Mazda 6, but torque is 45 NM less than Mazda 6. Thanks to more power Audi A5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Audi A5 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that by driving the Audi A5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi A5 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 1310 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1510 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 1160 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.45 m | |
| Audi A5 is 16 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi A5 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 481 litres | |
| Audi A5 has 1 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A5 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mazda 6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`095 | 2`182 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Audi A5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Audi A5, so Audi A5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 28 400 | 24 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A5 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |