Alfa Romeo 159 2008 vs Renault Megane 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 159 is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo 159 engine produces 40 HP more power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 27 NM more than Renault Megane. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo 159 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Alfa Romeo 159 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 159 could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo 159 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Megane 2009 1.6 engine: The Renault K4M 1.6 16V is one of the most durable and well-known engines in its class. It is simple, widely used, and generally not demanding, with many well-maintained examples reaching 400,000–500,000 km. The engine is not especially modern or economical by current standards, but it has a ... More about Renault Megane 2009 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo 159 is larger, but lower. Alfa Romeo 159 is 10 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 3 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 159 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 524 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1595 litres | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Alfa Romeo 159 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 159 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Megane. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`985 kg | 1`770 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Renault Megane has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 159 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Renault Megane, so Renault Megane quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 159 has
|
Renault Megane has
| |