Alfa Romeo 145 1999 vs Mazda 323 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo 145 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mazda 323 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.3 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 - 155 HP | 71 - 88 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 - 255 NM | 108 - 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 11.2 seconds | 11.8 - 16.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.7 | 6.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Alfa Romeo 145 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 323. On average, Alfa Romeo 145 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo 145 is 2 cm longer than the Mazda 323, 1 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 145 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 304 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1130 litres | no data | |
| Alfa Romeo 145 has 16 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 323. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 145 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 323, which means Alfa Romeo 145 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`710 | ~ 1`595 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 145 has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |