Nissan Qashqai 2013 reviews
Pros: I agree with what many say about this car - a very good price-quality ratio. For such car - high sitting position, sufficiently spacious, beautiful design, both internally and externally. A good standard equipment. Easy to handle, steering wheel is spinning very easily.
Cons: Very hard suspension, feels slightest hole. Bad picks up radio stations - receiver reinstalled, nothing changed. Radio station "alternate" function on wrong work - forcing radio stations ahead, beyond 3. channel doesn't work. If forces of other end, trapped for 6. station. The poor quality sound system - at basses. Incomplete Bluetooth system - sometimes mixes with phone. Incoming call does not display name of contact, only one number. Halogen passing very weak, poorly lit path. Cabin plastics rattles and door panels. Badly insulated archs, driving along a dirt road, very hears slightest little stone that hits arches, as well as driving through wet snow or puddles, it creates a lot of noise in lounge. Annoying headlamp washers - totally unnecessary extra, which only consumes window cleaning fluid, but taking advantage of it, lamp does not make any clean water as well as in winter snow freezes and consists of a layer of ice reducing visibility to lamps.
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Bought because wife very liked Qashqai design. Well, we thought price is not high, almost a jeep, lets take for her pleasure. We took the 1.2 version with all extras, brand new from dealer. Wife had pleasure for a week. The first repair at our expense, since guarantee is something else at dealers understanding. And so it was for 1,5 years, from which only 1 a week with joy.
Cons: The quality of Qashqai limps because produced (all of which are traded on LV) in Russia. Now think yourselves or is it worth it. I gave car to another car dealer, no matter how hard he didnt wanted it. I know thet my white Qashqai is recently sold for third time in a row.
| Purchase year: | 2016 new car) | Owned for | 45`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 11.0 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Nothing positive, very low quality, Nissan dealer couldn't solve problems
Cons: 2 x greater fuel consumption than manufacturer’ s stated. Rust on every door, low quality audio system, arch treatment - hears smallest rock, low quality colour and anti-rust treatment, also features an outdoor temperature sensor, replaced gear box, 2x painted, regulated, that's all new car!
| Purchase year: | 2016 new car) | Owned for | 5`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 10.0 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Roomy interior and trunk only.
Cons: I never thought that buying a new car will get headache at times. Don't advise anyone to take a 1.2 litre version with 6-speed gear box. Well that we have to give her back to dealer, but already at a lower price. Nissan will no longer be my choice ever. A terrible quality and car.
| Purchase year: | 2016 new car) | Owned for | 15`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1730 € (~ 865 € per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Overall, a very good package and price / performance ratio.
Cons: Higher fuel consumption than stated by manufacturer (2-3l / 100km on average more). Problems with radio. Archs on rural roads are really loud.
| Purchase year: | 2017 age of car 1 year) | Owned for | 11`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: If you buy, then diesel with a AT, simplest version without KeylessGo because less to be repaired - all of this cosmic technology
Cons: I would wish, better quality of Nissan.... but price says everything.
| Purchase year: | 2014 new car) | Owned for | 55`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 4.6 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Runs very well up to 100km/h. At 90km/h engine RPM is just 1900 - incredibly low for 1.2 engine. Great car for city.
Cons: Certainly won't fit for highway, after 110-120km/h no more acceleration.
| Purchase year: | 2017 age of car 3 years) | Owned for | 10`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.4 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: The idea is good, options also, but performances not so great.
Cons: Soft body. Weak diesel ecology - 38000 km and 2 times EGR problem and dead soot filter!!! I want to get rid of.
| Purchase year: | 2014 new car) | Owned for | 38`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2014 new car) | Owned for | 40`000 kilometers (4 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Rich extra equipment
Cons: Soft body; fragile soot filter
| Purchase year: | 2014 new car) | Owned for | 20`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Lot of extras
Cons: Soft body
| Purchase year: | 2016 age of car 2 years) | Owned for | 30`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.2 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A good setting.
| Purchase year: | 2015 new car) | Owned for | 33`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.1 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Well,