Ford Kuga
Ford Kuga technical data
Select Ford Kuga generation for full details - reviews, specifications, fuel consumption, pricing, quality and safety features, options, photos and more
Is Ford Kuga a reliable car?
Overall, the reliability of the Ford Kuga is average. The number of defects found on the Ford Kuga during the annual technical checkups is about average for a car of its age.
Based on annual roadworthiness tests results, the Ford Kuga generation produced from 2013 to 2016 received the highest reliability ratings, but the lowest reliability had models from model year 2016 to 2019.
Ford Kuga reviews
Total 8 Ford Kuga owner reviews
| Purchase year: | 2017 (age of car 6 years) | Owned for: | 8`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.2 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 280 € | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Nice car, easy to drive, low repair and maintenance costs. Maybe only a diesel would not be suitable for the city, because sooner or later the problem with the soot filter will have to be solved, but removing it and rechipping the car did not change the power and driveability. But overall stable and comfortable, powerful. I bought the car 5y and with 200,000 original miles.
Cons: Rear seated passengers have complaints about rear climate control, either very hot and airless, or cold.
| Purchase year: | 2018 (age of car 4 years) | Owned for: | 40`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.5 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 225 € (~ 112 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very good all-wheel drive, no tractor to look for. Dynamic enough. Rich equipment at an affordable price. Lots of extras like a luxury car. Excellent Sony audio system.
Cons: In winter, the sensors on the door handles (for locking / unlocking) tend to fade. The 2.0 diesel engine could be more economical on the highway, there is little difference when driving around the city or outside.
| Purchase year: | 2008 (new car) | Owned for: | 120`000 kilometers (13 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 2000 € (~ 153 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very easy to drive, good to understand which speed is set, good start, short braking distance, good capacity (can be put in the back of big men's bikes, lowering seats and all kinds of hidden luggage compartments), comfortable, big steering wheel. Ideal if the permitted speed is higher than 110
Cons: expensive tires
| Purchase year: | 2016 (age of car 8 years) | Owned for: | 2`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1400 € (~ 1400 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A good, cheap crossover, wheel spins with one finger, quiet dynamic. Audio system super!!! If you have a car just from Germany, of course have to repair.
Cons: Windscreen wipers working a little too early. There is no Scandinavian light, either type of sunny days, also automatically turn on.
| Purchase year: | 2017 (age of car 4 years) | Owned for: | 3`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.5 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 70 € | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very elegant, dynamic, comfortable car. Maintenance costs very acceptable. For 4 years car haven't required any additional costs.
| Purchase year: | 2013 (age of car 1 year) | Owned for: | 134`000 kilometers (4 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.5 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Reliable, flexible, dynamic