Dacia Duster 2013
Good for light off-roading. Relatively low fuel consumption, although more attention could be paid to aerodynamics. The music system a lot is good, at least you can't hear the plastic grab the edges. The interior warms up fairly quickly and holds the heat well. The turning angle is good. Turns on narrow roads or forest paths.
read all Dacia Duster reviews
This generation of Dacia Duster (facelift model) has been produced from January, 2013 to December, 2017. We can provide information about 9 modifications of this generation. 2013 Dacia Duster is available with four wheel (4x4) drive (2 versions) and front wheel drive (7 versions). Four wheel drive models have AWD (all wheel drive) system (power is automatically distributed between the wheel axles).
This Dacia is available with two petrol engines with displacement from 1.2 to 1.6 litres and power of from 105 to 125 horsepower un three diesel engines with displacement 1.5 litres and power of from 90 to 110 horsepower.
The car is available with both manual (8 versions), as well as automatic (1 version) gearbox.
Dacia Duster 2013 average fuel consumption in combined cycle for petrol engine is from 6.3 to 8 litres per 100km, whereas for diesel engine - from 4.5 to 5.2 litres per 100km. The most fuel efficient Dacia Duster 2013 petrol engine version is DACIA Duster 1.2L TCe FWD, consuming 6.3 litres per 100km. While the most fuel efficient Dacia Duster 2013 diesel - DACIA Duster 1.5L dCi FWD 110 Hp Automatic for 100 kilometers consumes 4.5 liters of diesel.
According to user reviews, Dacia Duster real-world fuel consumption is on average about approximately for 25 percents higher as the manufacturer's claimed fuel economy (on average +20% for petrol engines and +30% for diesel engines). For a more detailed actual fuel economy of each model, select a specific Dacia Duster modification.
Dacia Duster 2013 CO2 emissions for petrol engine are from 145 to 185 grams per kilometer, whereas for diesel engine - from 116 to 135 grams per kilometer. From Dacia Duster with petrol engines the lowest CO2 emissions has DACIA Duster 1.2L TCe FWD which produces an average of 145 grams of CO2 per kilometer. In turn, from the Dacia Duster diesels least CO2 distributes DACIA Duster 1.5L dCi FWD 110 Hp Automatic - 116 grams per km.
The best acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h - 11 seconds has Dacia Duster 1.6 SCe LPG version, conversely the tardiest one is DACIA Duster 1.5L dCi FWD 90 Hp reaching this speed only in 13.8 seconds. The maximum top speed is 171 km/h for the 1.5 diesel 110 hp version (DACIA Duster 1.5L dCi FWD 110 Hp).
Lenght of Dacia Duster is 432 cm, it is medium size car. Dacia Duster gross weight is from 1709 to 1844 kg (depending on modification), which is about 20 percent lighter than the average for this age and class.
This Dacia is very cheap for its class - it can be purchased (in Latvia, EU) for around 6500 €. According to user reviews, average Dacia Duster repair costs are 70 € per year. Below you will find more detailed information about Dacia Duster prices and costs.
In user reviews Dacia Duster received average grade 7.6 (from 10) it corresponds to average rate for cars of this age. Ratings are quite controversial, both positive and not so good, read more in the reviews below. 70% of reviewers would recommend this car to the friend.
Dacia Duster modifications
Modification | Engine | Power | Consumption | Gearbox | Drive type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
DACIA Duster 2013 1.2L TCe FWD
Jan 2013 — Jan 2017 Most powerfull petrol version (125 HP) |
1.2 Petrol | 125 HP | 6.3 l/100km | Manual (6) | Front wheel |
DACIA Duster 2013 1.5L dCi FWD 90 Hp
Jan 2013 — Jan 2017 Most fuel efficient diesel version by real consumption |
1.5 Diesel | 90 HP | 4.7 l/100km | Manual (6) | Front wheel |
DACIA Duster 2013 1.5L dCi 4x4 Jan 2013 — Jan 2017 | 1.5 Diesel | 109 HP | 5.2 l/100km | Manual (6) | All wheel |
DACIA Duster 2013 1.5L dCi FWD 110 Hp
Jan 2013 — Jan 2017 Most powerfull diesel version (110 HP) |
1.5 Diesel | 110 HP | 4.8 l/100km | Manual (6) | Front wheel |
DACIA Duster 2013 1.5L dCi FWD 110 Hp Automatic
Jan 2013 — Jan 2017 Most powerfull diesel version (110 HP) |
1.5 Diesel | 110 HP | 4.5 l/100km | Automatic (6) | Front wheel |
DACIA Duster 2013 1.6L FWD Jan 2013 — Jan 2017 | 1.6 Petrol | 105 HP | 7.1 l/100km | Manual (6) | Front wheel |
DACIA Duster 2013 1.6L 4x4 Jan 2013 — Jan 2017 | 1.6 Petrol | 105 HP | 8.0 l/100km | Manual (6) | All wheel |
Dacia Duster 2013 1.6 LPG | 1.6 LPG | 105 HP | 9.0 l/100km | Manual (5) | Front wheel |
Dacia Duster 2015 1.6 SCe LPG
Jan 2015 — Dec 2017 Most dynamic version - 100 km/h in 11 seconds |
1.6 LPG | 114 HP | 6.4 l/100km | Manual (5) | Front wheel |
Dacia Duster prices
Dacia Duster 2013 - 2017 crossover price in Latvia is from 4800 € to 8000 €.
Comparing to analogical vehicles Dacia Duster price is very low - Dacia Duster is approximately for 49 percents cheaper then average crossovers of this age (compare crossovers 2013 - 2017 prices). The reason of Dacia Duster low price could be its poor quality (see below) so we recommend particularly examine the car before purchase and do not choose it only by price.
Year | Lowest | Average | Highest | Availability |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dacia Duster 2017 price | 6500 € | 7000 € | 7500 € | |
Dacia Duster 2016 price | 6500 € | 6500 € | 7000 € | |
Dacia Duster 2015 price | 5500 € | 6500 € | 8000 € | |
Dacia Duster 2014 price | 5000 € | 6000 € | 7500 € | |
Dacia Duster 2013 price | 4800 € | 6000 € | 7500 € |
Dacia Duster total costs of ownership
How much really costs to own Dacia Duster?
Dacia Duster 2013 total costs of ownership calculator
Calculate total cost of ownership of the Dacia Duster, including purchase, insurance, maintenance, taxes and other costs based on how you use your vehicle.
Dacia Duster reliability and quality
According to yearly reports of vehicle inspection service Dacia Duster reliability is extremely low. In the roadworthiness tests in 2022 defects were detected in an average of 19.3 percent of Dacia Duster of this generation (on average 7 years old at the time of inspection). The average failure rate for a vehicles of the same age was 11.8%.
Dacia Duster reliability and quality
Most reliable 10-14 year old used cars
Most reliable 10-14 year old used crossovers
Dacia Duster 2013 features (options)
Percentage of Dacia Duster with corresponding feature (option)
88% Metallic paint
41% Tire pressure control
19% Climate control
13%
Dacia Duster 2013 photo images
Similar cars to Dacia Duster 2013
Cars similar and most compared to Dacia Duster 2013. Click on the image to view the car's specifications or on the "Compare..." link to compare cars.
- manual gearbox only
- lower price
- fewer faults
- lower fuel consumption
- petrol and diesel engines available
- fewer faults
- petrol and diesel engines available
- fewer faults
- lower price
- roomier boot
- lower fuel consumption
- petrol and diesel engines available
- fewer faults
- lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
- lower price
- fewer faults
Dacia Duster reviews
Total 14 Dacia Duster owner reviews

Pros: Good for light off-roading. Relatively low fuel consumption, although more attention could be paid to aerodynamics. The music system a lot is good, at least you can't hear the plastic grab the edges. The interior warms up fairly quickly and holds the heat well. The turning angle is good. Turns on narrow roads or forest paths.
Cons: Aerodynamics weak. The car is rocking in the biggest wind. The power is low, but if you get used to it, it's still good. Clearance demands higher because it is easy to dig into the worse forest roads. That lambda or some wire underneath it in an extremely useless place, and no protector for it, can be pulled on a dry thistle, so up to 70km / h the car goes as it goes, the power disappears, the agony can get higher. Consumption is good only on straight dry roads or downhill. It becomes increasingly difficult to get it lower every day due to bad weather and frequent services. Rust. Details expensive, tend to ship long. The machine has a weak body, the bonnet can be folded with one finger. In terms of volume, my previous car 2007 Mazda6 was better. There, the novus table can be placed horizontally, the duster only diognolically, thus occupying an irrational space in the cabin. Had to be placed on the roof. The suspension is weak, but perhaps if you were only driving on a good asphalt road, it would be good. If you need to sleep (in the driver's chair) then I can say that it is the most uncomfortable machine of all. Even golf4 is more comfortable sleeping. Ill-considered front, because plastics should be constantly changed, the possible angle could have been different. The bonnet moves slightly when driving on the road, feeling the latch open. Nor can you see the path behind it, even when sitting in the highest sitting position. Could be compared. It has been repeatedly said in a car service that this car is not for the forest, but for the city. It is better to buy an x5 then because the parts are also very expensive. In the car service says "if you can buy a normal SUV, you better do it" - this car is definitely not! One could write something else, but long texts like most people don't like to read :) P.S. I advised a friend not to buy this car - he bought it - I said that the mistake - he got the pin right - it took about half a year, now he says I don't buy a duster - he got acquainted with the car and broke it. Don't buy, please don't take my mistakes for yourself. The older versions are even worse than the latest ones.
Purchase year: | 2018 age of car 4 years) | Owned for | 48`000 kilometers (1 year) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 6.6 litres per 100km (20% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 3990 € (~ 3990 € per year) |
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend