Dacia Duster 2013 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Dacia Duster is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Citroen Xsara Picasso can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel, lPG) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Dacia Duster is available also with LPG engines. LPG engines generally provide lower running costs and cleaner emissions compared to petrol and diesel engines. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 125 HP | 90 - 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 - 250 NM | 135 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 - 13.8 seconds | 10.8 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 9.0 | 4.9 - 8.7 | |
|
Dacia Duster petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara Picasso. On average, Dacia Duster equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Dacia Duster is larger, but slightly lower. Dacia Duster is 4 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 7 cm wider, while the height of Dacia Duster is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 475 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1636 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Dacia Duster has 75 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. This could mean that the Dacia Duster uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Duster is 1.1 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Dacia Duster can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`761 | ~ 1`267 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Duster has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |