Volvo S60
Volvo S60 technical data
Select Volvo S60 generation for full details - reviews, specifications, fuel consumption, pricing, quality and safety features, options, photos and more
Is Volvo S60 a reliable car?
Overall, the reliability of the Volvo S60 is average. The number of defects found on the Volvo S60 during the annual technical checkups is about average for a car of its age.
According to these reviews, the highest reliability scores achieved Volvo S60 generation from 2010 to 2013, while the models produced from 2004 to 2009 had the lowest reliability ratings, reliability scores vary quite significantly between generations of Volvo S60. For more information, check the respective generation information.
Volvo S60 reviews
Total 46 Volvo S60 owner reviews
| Purchase year: | 2014 (age of car 11 years) | Owned for: | 70`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.5 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 870 € (~ 435 € per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Comfortable seats, quiet driving
Cons: Few place in back, hard for LV roads Gearbox works strange, small turning radius, Onboard Computer occasionally throws out errors which disappears after a period of time?. Often lamps burn out, Xenon lamps, Expensive details needed to get only genuine, otherwise, lamp flickers and extinguished. For this year and often disproportionately costly car repairs. An average of around 100-200 EUR per month.
| Purchase year: | 2013 (age of car 13 years) | Owned for: | 60`000 kilometers (5 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 10.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 440 € (~ 88 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Convenient and reliable car.
Cons: Boring! And I'm not talking about aggressive driving, or something. A good car, but it's all, reliable transport with which to move on a day-to-day basis.
Large turning radius, not everywhere can turn around with one touch, as it was with previous car who was same size.
| Purchase year: | 2019 (age of car 19 years) | Owned for: | 3`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: The motor is powerful, if short trips are to be made, then it is better not. It is intended more for longer journeys, then fuel consumption is 6-7 l/100 km. Defrosting the front window.
Cons: Even with modern diagnostic methods, it is not possible to determine the cause of poor operation.
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 10 years) | Owned for: | 30`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 500 € (~ 166 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very good machine. Well-nicked. The machine is already 13 years old, but rust can not be found anywhere.
Cons: Large turning radius. An inexperienced driver will find it harder to park or reverse the machine.
| Purchase year: | 2007 (age of car 8 years) | Owned for: | 50`000 kilometers (9 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: 1. A highly durable! 2. Stainless bodywork 3. Average fuel consumption 4. Impact resistant
Cons: More for driving on highway not country roads - soft springs.
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 10 years) | Owned for: | 1 year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 4.9 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Economical, spacious interior (not compressed), repair cannot be said that cheap, but price is in line with quality. Winter is not abused.
| Purchase year: | 2016 (age of car 14 years) | Owned for: | 20`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 100 € | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Comfort, durable, soft, with gas VERY economic!
Cons: A little lacking in capacity, large turning angle, slightly awkward car