Volvo S40 2007 reviews
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 4 years) | Owned for: | 40`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 4.0 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1430 € (~ 715 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Easy handling, stable ride on any speed, small fuel consumption.
Cons: 2.0 is best engine for this car.
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 5 years) | Owned for: | 42`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.5 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 640 € (~ 320 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Stable, quiet, economical, a good navigation panel
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 5 years) | Owned for: | 15`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 360 € (~ 360 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Sufficient power 110 hp, economical, quiet.
| Purchase year: | 2022 (age of car 16 years) | Owned for: | 11`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.4 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Good car. Visually beautiful. Small but compact, will fit tall dudes (the fifth one will have to make his own way). Can't complain about boot space. Excellent if you're a student, not too expensive to maintain. Parts are relatively cheap. I've only changed one bearing in 9 months. The 2-litre diesel is economical and reasonably peppy. I use it a lot as I work as a courier - no major problems. If you look after it regularly, it will last a long time, as with any car. Of the 4 cars I have owned at a fairly young age, this has definitely been the most reliable.
Cons: Incomprehensible electronics. Rust will do its work in time, but only around one arch for now. I'm 1.90m so it tends to be a bit tight, but I'm not complaining too much. Has become a bit sluggish due to turbine wear. Visibility is kind of the same, but you can get by.
| Purchase year: | 2022 (age of car 16 years) | Owned for: | 15`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Stable, reliable
Cons: Hard to pour petrol - kick back
| Purchase year: | 2007 (age of car 1 year) | Owned for: | 97`000 kilometers (10 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 550 € (~ 55 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2005 (new car) | Owned for: | 315`000 kilometers (15 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (20% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1705 € (~ 113 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Car compatibility on poor roads, perfect anti-skid system, reliability of car systems, comfortable seats, good looks. 5-cylinder engine sound and power. With a gas system (from 170000km), the fuel costs are similar to those of the D1.6 engine, but the power have not changed.
Cons: Low rack, Large window brackets for poor visibility at intersections, but security requires its own.