Renault Laguna
Renault Laguna technical data
Select Renault Laguna generation for full details - reviews, specifications, fuel consumption, pricing, quality and safety features, options, photos and more
Is Renault Laguna a reliable car?
The Renault Laguna is not a very reliable car. 75% of other cars of the same age are found to have fewer defects than the Renault Laguna in annual roadworthiness tests.
Based on these reviews, the highest reliability scores were demonstrated by Renault Laguna generation from 2013 , but the lowest reliability had models from model year 2005 to 2006, reliability scores vary quite significantly between generations of Renault Laguna. For more information, check the respective generation information.
Most Renault Laguna engines use a timing belt, which is generally regarded as less reliable than engines with a timing chain.
Renault Laguna reviews
Total 23 Renault Laguna owner reviews
| Purchase year: | 2017 (age of car 13 years) | Owned for: | 30`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 830 € (~ 276 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: The biggest advantage of the machine is that it costs very cheaply in the used market and rusts more slowly than others.
Fuel consumption and engine power very well. Quite comfortable and spacious car.
The machine is also considered safe. I hit a deer once, without any bumps in front.
Cons: Electronics is a weak point. I try not to open windows unnecessarily. The warning lights on the panel are on and there is no reason to light them. Climate control sometimes regulates the climate on its own.
The running gear must be inspected regular.
| Purchase year: | 2018 (age of car 11 years) | Owned for: | 70`000 kilometers (5 years) |
|---|
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: It is a cool looking car (I mean the black version), luxurious, very fast, safe, spacious and beautiful.
Cons: I can't say anything negative, maybe just that the cranes in front of the windows broke.
| Purchase year: | 2016 (age of car 7 years) | Owned for: | 15`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.5 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 170 € (~ 170 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Laguna coupé - good comfort, sufficient engine power, low fuel consumption. Visually beautiful model.
Cons: Uniform color choice - too saves on production costs (raking in profits)
| Purchase year: | 2018 (age of car 9 years) | Owned for: | 40`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 200 € (~ 100 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: GT 2.0 petrol / gas delivers driving pleasure and does not frustrate fuel costs. Very practical, neat interior
Cons: Repressed interest from other road users
| Purchase year: | 2017 (age of car 14 years) | Owned for: | 50`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: The very turbo version can make a surprise for BMW owners. Big, comfortable, smooth going. Stable on the road.
Cons: Rear axle bushings and replacement
| Purchase year: | 2016 (age of car 14 years) | Owned for: | 36`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1050 € | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Convenient office, a lot of space inside. Low consumption outside city.
Cons: A lot of repairs. A loud engine.
| Purchase year: | 2016 (age of car 11 years) | Owned for: | 100`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.7 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1401 € (~ 700 € per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very comfortable interior
Cons: One big mess. Unable to predict when something wrong happens again