Nissan Juke 2010 reviews
Pros: Economic, urban type of car. At carwash charged, as for small car. But in winter, when you need to go somewhere off snow, you may feel that this is a Jeep! Car for the woman.
Cons: Slow acceleration
Purchase year: | 2012 age of car 1 year) | Owned for | 40`000 kilometers (4 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 7.8 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: On average powerful, a short but stout yet stylish travel tool, stable on road, also in winter, governable,
Cons: The body of window frame a thick, so could sometimes be difficult in transparency.
Purchase year: | 2013 new car) | Owned for | 35`000 kilometers (2 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A new car is good
Cons: Poor visibility in side mirrors (too large mirrors)
Purchase year: | 2012 new car) | Owned for | 85`000 kilometers (4 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Purchase year: | 2014 new car) | Owned for | 15`000 kilometers (1 year) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 6.0 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very ergonomic and comfortable back seats, adjustable steering wheel. The Nissan Juke 1.6 Turbo version is all-wheel drive. I don't complain about the acceleration - the Turbo engine reached 100 kilometers per hour in 7.8 seconds. My car can reach max speed 215 km / h.
Purchase year: | 2015 new car) | Owned for | 40`000 kilometers (4 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 6.9 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend