Nissan Juke
Nissan Juke technical data
Select Nissan Juke generation for full details - reviews, specifications, fuel consumption, pricing, quality and safety features, options, photos and more
Is Nissan Juke a reliable car?
In general, the Nissan Juke reliability is slightly below average. The number of defects found on the Nissan Juke during the annual technical inspections is just above average for cars of a similar age.
Based on annual roadworthiness tests results, the Nissan Juke generation produced from 2019 received the highest reliability ratings, but the lowest reliability had models from model year 2010 to 2014, reliability scores vary quite significantly between generations of Nissan Juke. For more information, check the respective generation information.
Most Nissan Juke engines utilize a timing chain drive, which is widely regarded as more dependable compared to engines with a timing belt drive.
Nissan Juke reviews
Total 10 Nissan Juke owner reviews
| Purchase year: | 2018 (new car) | Owned for: | 30`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.0 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Juke is that small SUV, very practical in winter. The car has low fuel consumption, low operating costs. I like parking sensors, which make driving a car comfortable and safe. The plastic in the cabin, which some call cheap, does not affect the car's ride and handling and looks good in my car kit.
| Purchase year: | 2015 (new car) | Owned for: | 40`000 kilometers (4 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.9 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very ergonomic and comfortable back seats, adjustable steering wheel. The Nissan Juke 1.6 Turbo version is all-wheel drive. I don't complain about the acceleration - the Turbo engine reached 100 kilometers per hour in 7.8 seconds. My car can reach max speed 215 km / h.
| Purchase year: | 2012 (age of car 1 year) | Owned for: | 40`000 kilometers (4 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.8 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Economic, urban type of car. At carwash charged, as for small car. But in winter, when you need to go somewhere off snow, you may feel that this is a Jeep! Car for the woman.
Cons: Slow acceleration
| Purchase year: | 2013 (new car) | Owned for: | 35`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: On average powerful, a short but stout yet stylish travel tool, stable on road, also in winter, governable,
Cons: The body of window frame a thick, so could sometimes be difficult in transparency.
| Purchase year: | 2012 (new car) | Owned for: | 85`000 kilometers (4 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A new car is good
Cons: Poor visibility in side mirrors (too large mirrors)