Nissan Almera
Nissan Almera technical data
Select Nissan Almera generation for full details - reviews, specifications, fuel consumption, pricing, quality and safety features, options, photos and more
Is Nissan Almera a reliable car?
Nissan Almera is a reliable car. In terms of the number of defects found during annual inspections, the Nissan Almera scores better than 75% of other cars of a similar age tested.
Based on annual roadworthiness tests results, the Nissan Almera generation produced from 2000 to 2002 received the highest reliability ratings, while the models produced from 2002 to 2006 had the lowest reliability ratings (which were in any case better than the average reliability for cars of this age), but overall the reliability scores of all tested Nissan Almera generations are quite similar.
Most Nissan Almera engines utilize a timing chain drive, which is widely regarded as more dependable compared to engines with a timing belt drive.
Nissan Almera reviews
Total 11 Nissan Almera owner reviews
Pros: Giggle and a rather brisk diaper, easy to park in town Don't love long downtime - drive. Body does not rust. Very suitable for mothers with young children. Luggage roomy. Engine is starting without problems in winter as well as in summer.
| Purchase year: | 2015 age of car 11 years) | Owned for | 35`000 kilometers (4 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 4.8 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: In all weather conditions will not fail, starts even in larger colds if there's normal battery. Very good amortization, stability. Good riding.
Cons: The main threat is corrosion.
| Purchase year: | 2009 age of car 13 years) | Owned for | 150`000 kilometers (5 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Although old, but strong car. For first car, or to drive around country, a very good option.
Cons: Quite light, sometimes you get feeling that will be blown off highway.
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.0 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A simple, easy to manage, easy! More positive than negative.
Cons: Rust, but not very much, for 20 years old car even short!
| Purchase year: | 2017 age of car 21 year) | Owned for | 8`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.8 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 130 € | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A small but very economical car. In general a good car. Technical inspection without problems.
| Purchase year: | 2015 age of car 11 years) | Owned for | 175`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 4.8 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A good car, where a low mileage.
Cons: Could be better sound insulation.
| Purchase year: | 2015 age of car 11 years) | Owned for | 6`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.5 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2008 age of car 3 years) | Owned for | 90`000 kilometers (8 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.0 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Large and comfortable interior, despite small size