Mitsubishi Pajero
Mitsubishi Pajero technical data
Select Mitsubishi Pajero generation for full details - reviews, specifications, fuel consumption, pricing, quality and safety features, options, photos and more
Is Mitsubishi Pajero a reliable car?
Overall, the reliability of the Mitsubishi Pajero is average. The number of defects found on the Mitsubishi Pajero during the annual technical checkups is about average for a car of its age.
Based on annual roadworthiness tests results, the Mitsubishi Pajero generation produced from 1991 to 1997 received the highest reliability ratings, while the models produced from 2006 had the lowest reliability ratings, reliability scores vary quite significantly between generations of Mitsubishi Pajero. For more information, check the respective generation information.
Most Mitsubishi Pajero engines use a timing belt, which is generally regarded as less reliable than engines with a timing chain.
Mitsubishi Pajero reviews
Total 10 Mitsubishi Pajero owner reviews
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 20 years) | Owned for: | 30`000 kilometers (4 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 12.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: I have owned this as my hunting truck for 4 years roughly.
I have taken it over some of the roughest terrain you could imagine.
Heres the thing, it wont brake, i have tried and tried and i have never, ever broken this car, not 1 repair required after 30 000km of driving.
Passes a warrant of fitness every 6 months without fail and never needs anything done.
I have used it for towing when i have been fixing up houses and it does amazingly well even with up to 1800kg on the back it goes up hills well.
The sunroof is huge and great when shooting rabbits at night as the boys just pop their heads out and shoot off the roof.
It has tons of room with 7 seats and plenty of storage, it has cup holders everywhere.
It has diff-locks and auto locking hubs.
It has adjustable suspension and looks amazing even though its old.
Its cheaper than a Toyota and doesn´t break as much, its also cheaper to fix!
I never want to part with this truck, i can´t imagine a better one for what i do and it never gives up!!!
Cons: Uuuuuummmmmmm i can´t think of anything...
| Purchase year: | 2014 (age of car 10 years) | Owned for: | 15`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 11.0 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 3885 $ (~ 3885 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Large comfortable, roomy 7-vietīgs and relatively low cost with good trafficability
Cons: A loud engine
| Purchase year: | 2006 (new car) | Owned for: | 236`000 kilometers (11 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 10.0 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: I drive where I want... I like it
Cons: Need a lot of fuel
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 6 years) | Owned for: | 10`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 11.5 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Cons: Consumption might be slightly lower
| Purchase year: | 2009 (new car) | Owned for: | 130`000 kilometers (7 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.6 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Cool car
Cons: could be a quieter cabin