Honda CR-V
Honda CR-V technical data
Please choose Honda CR-V generation to gain full info - reviews, technical specifications, prices, quality and safety data, options and photos
Honda CR-V reviews
Total 24 Honda CR-V owner reviews
| Purchase year: | 2018 (age of car 12 years) | Owned for: | 33`000 kilometers (4 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.8 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 78 € (~ 19 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Relatively good passability. Good running qualities (with a 6 at 100 acceleration is great). Huge (with seats folded) luggage space. Full spare wheel on tailgate. Hatch, cruise,folding picnic table, seat heating. Consumption 5.8-6.6 on tarmac with 6th gear at 100kmh. Average around 7.8. Interior warms up very quickly in winter (incredible for a diesel). This is my 9th car so far, not thinking of changing. Very good value for money.
Cons: The steering wheel adjusts only in the upright position. The windscreen and side windows get very smudged when entering a puddle at higher speeds. Must use only specifieded oils. Very sensitive to fuel quality.
| Purchase year: | 2020 (age of car 13 years) | Owned for: | 45`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 300 € (~ 150 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: The perfect balance between fuel economy, off-road capability and highway stability. Consumption on the track, if you keep the speed to 90 kmh, is around 6l/100, in the city it starts to burn 9l. Pulls through muddy forest roads and snow without problems. Reliable and easy to repair. Capacious, spacious and ergonomic. Diesel powerful enough and good torque.
Folding back the front seat to create a comfortable sofa.
Cons: Low beam too dim (halogen)
Rear seats do not retract into the floor - can not get a flat surface.
Terrain would require a higher one, but then stability is lost in turns. Better not crawl to hard off-road.
Differential requires special Honda oil.
| Purchase year: | 2012 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 180`000 kilometers (5 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.5 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1000 € (~ 200 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: The engine and all electronics operated all 5 years without any problems
Cons: Right windshield wiper (when viewed from driver's side) is not suitable for winter conditions, because it’ s stem is a very long spring, as a result of a lack of power to gum properly pressed against glass. If you're in winter as a result of above minus 10 degrees below zero, then right wiper just glides over dirt. I think about this problem, multiple times said in service and it was as though they tried to tighten in spring, but it failed to prevent problem, because that is constructive.
| Purchase year: | 2006 (age of car 5 years) | Owned for: | 80`000 kilometers (11 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A reliable car. Lot of space in back benches. Precise steering wheel. Cool table in luggage compartment, good transparency within a radius of 360 degrees. Separately opened a door for luggage, easy access to spare wheel.
Cons: High centre of gravity, therefore not so stable on bends.
| Purchase year: | 2003 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 170`000 kilometers (14 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 10.0 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Reliable, surprisingly spacious, comfortable, functional, easily manipulated, sufficiently dynamic. 2. model plus that there is no middle console - you can navigate through all car. Fabulous picnic table - trunk floor. I don't know why new models do not see these "extras".
Cons: Fuel consumption, but if put in gas, then it is ok.
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 11`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2008 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 100`000 kilometers (9 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.5 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Durable running gear.
Cons: If equipped with additional gas unit, then you need to take into account that should be carried out every second year in valve adjustment, Japanese car, unlike German car valves shall be weak link, if use of gas.