Volvo XC90 2014 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Volvo XC90) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 225 HP | 178 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 261 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC90 engine produces 47 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 209 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 12.2 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 6.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 960 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Volvo XC90 is larger, but lower. Volvo XC90 is 5 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 13 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 615 litres | 663 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1886 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo XC90 has 48 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. This could mean that the Volvo XC90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 2`810 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 200 | 19 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |