Volvo XC90 2014 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 225 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC90 engine produces 55 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 97 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 6.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 10.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC90 consumes 4.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 720 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC90 consumes 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Volvo XC90 is larger, but lower. Volvo XC90 is 5 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 13 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 615 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1886 litres | 1790 litres | |
|
Volvo XC90 has more luggage capacity. Volvo XC90 has 400 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 96 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 26 400 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |