Volvo XC90 2014 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 4.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 225 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 650 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Volvo XC90 engine produces 47 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 180 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Despite less power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 9.5 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 555 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.87 m | |
| Volvo XC90 and Toyota Land Cruiser are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 615 litres | 259 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1886 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo XC90 has more luggage capacity. Volvo XC90 has 356 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 3`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 400 | 31 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |