Volvo XC90 2014 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 4.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 225 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 650 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volvo XC90 engine produces 24 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 180 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 9.5 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 555 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.96 m | |
| Volvo XC90 and Toyota Land Cruiser are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 615 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1886 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`750 kg | 3`350 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`078 kg | 2`640 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 672 kg | 710 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | 54 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |