Volvo XC90 2014 vs Nissan Murano 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Volvo XC90) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Nissan Murano) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 225 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 325 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC90 engine produces 24 HP less power than Nissan Murano, but torque is 145 NM more than Nissan Murano. Despite less power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 10.2 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 4.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Murano, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 660 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Volvo XC90 is larger. Volvo XC90 is 5 cm longer than the Nissan Murano, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 615 litres | 909 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1886 litres | 1897 litres | |
|
Nissan Murano has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo XC90 has 294 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Murano. This could mean that the Volvo XC90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Murano (by 11 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 200 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Nissan Murano has
| |