Volvo XC90 2014 vs Mercedes ML 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 225 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC90 engine produces 21 HP more power than Mercedes ML, but torque is 30 NM less than Mercedes ML. Thanks to more power Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC90 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC90 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Volvo XC90 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo XC90 is 15 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 8 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 615 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1886 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 27 600 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |