Volvo XC90 2014 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 4.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 225 HP | 339 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC90 engine produces 114 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 230 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC90 consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC90 consumes 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 105 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Volvo XC90 is smaller. Volvo XC90 is 5 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 615 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1886 litres | 2030 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Volvo XC90 has 65 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover. The Land Rover Range Rover may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover (by 144 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Volvo XC90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC90 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo XC90 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 400 | 47 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |