Volvo XC90 2014 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 225 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| Volvo XC90 engine produces 24 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Despite less power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.9 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 86 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1240 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 238 mm (9.4 inches) | 297 mm (11.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Volvo XC90 is smaller. Volvo XC90 is 5 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 615 litres | 639 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1886 litres | 1943 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage space. Volvo XC90 has 24 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover (by 57 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Volvo XC90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`750 kg | 3`100 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`078 kg | 2`253 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 672 kg | 847 kg | |
| Volvo XC90 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 26 procentiem less than Land Rover Range Rover. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | 94 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |