Volvo XC90 2014 vs Fiat Freemont 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 225 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC90 engine produces 55 HP more power than Fiat Freemont, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Fiat Freemont. Thanks to more power Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC90 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Freemont, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC90 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Freemont. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 238 mm (9.4 inches) | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Volvo XC90 is larger. Volvo XC90 is 6 cm longer than the Fiat Freemont, 13 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 615 litres | 145 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 250 litres | 145 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 615 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1886 litres | 1461 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Volvo XC90 has more luggage space (by 105 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 425 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Fiat Freemont. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`750 kg | 2`510 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`078 kg | 2`089 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 672 kg | 421 kg | |
| Volvo XC90 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 37 procentiem more than Fiat Freemont. Therefore, Volvo XC90 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC90 scores higher in safety tests, but Fiat Freemont is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo XC90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Fiat Freemont has
| |