Volvo XC90 2014 vs Audi Q7 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 225 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
|
Audi Q7 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC90 engine produces 47 HP less power than Audi Q7, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Audi Q7. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC90 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC90 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1390 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 5.01 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC90 is 6 cm shorter than the Audi Q7, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 615 litres | 770 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 250 litres | 770 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 615 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1886 litres | 1955 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Audi Q7 has more luggage space (by 520 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q7 (by 69 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Audi Q7, which means Volvo XC90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 2`940 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC90 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo XC90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 23 600 | 32 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |