Volvo XC90 2011 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 247 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC90 engine produces 47 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC90 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC90 could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC90 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC90 is 2 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 782 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 249 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 600 litres | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | 1554 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space (by 182 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 283 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 2`949 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 26 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |