Volvo XC90 2011 vs Mercedes ML 2011

 
Volvo XC90
2011 - 2014
Mercedes ML
2011 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.4 Diesel3.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 163 HP258 HP
Torque: 340 NM620 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.8 seconds7.4 seconds
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving.
Volvo XC90 engine produces 95 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 280 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.26.8
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo XC90 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC90 could require 210 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 820 km in combined cycle1020 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway1110 km on highway
Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.81 m4.80 m
Width: 1.94 m1.93 m
Height: 1.78 m1.80 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC90 and Mercedes ML are practically the same length.
Seats: 7 seatsno data
Trunk capacity: 249 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 249 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 600 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1837 litresno data
Turning diameter: 12.5 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`6802`950
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 12 20017 800
Pros and Cons: Volvo XC90 has
  • lower price
Mercedes ML has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv