Volvo XC90 2011 vs Mercedes ML 2011
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 163 HP | 258 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 620 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC90 engine produces 95 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 280 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 6.8 | |
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC90 could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
1000 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.81 m | 4.80 m | |
Width: | 1.94 m | 1.93 m | |
Height: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC90 and Mercedes ML are practically the same length. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 249 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 600 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`680 | 2`950 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 12 000 | 18 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |