Volvo XC90 2011 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC90 engine produces 82 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 260 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 9.2 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Volvo XC90 is 3 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 249 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 600 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`680 | 3`175 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |