Volvo XC90 2011 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 248 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC90 engine produces 85 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 260 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 7.3 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC90 could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 77 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Volvo XC90 is smaller, but slightly higher. Volvo XC90 is 4 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 14 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 784 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 249 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 600 litres | 784 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | no data | |
| In 5-seat version Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space (by 184 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`680 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 41 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |