Volvo XC90 2011 vs Land Rover Discovery 2009
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 163 HP | 245 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 600 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
Land Rover Discovery is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC90 engine produces 82 HP less power than Land Rover Discovery, whereas torque is 260 NM less than Land Rover Discovery. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 9.3 | |
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 82 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
1000 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.81 m | 4.84 m | |
Width: | 1.94 m | no data | |
Height: | 1.78 m | 1.89 m | |
Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 249 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 600 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Land Rover Discovery, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`680 | 3`240 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 11 000 | 10 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |