Volvo XC90 2011 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 243 HP | 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 347 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC90 engine produces 43 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 | 10.4 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC90 could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 500'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC90 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80 | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC90 is 2 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 782 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 249 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 600 litres | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | 1554 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space (by 182 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 283 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`760 | 2`812 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 25 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |