Volvo XC90 2006 vs Volvo XC90 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Volvo XC90 2006 engine produces 22 HP more power than Volvo XC90 2005, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Volvo XC90 2005. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC90 2005 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volvo XC90 2006 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90 2005, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 2006 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo XC90 2006 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90 2005. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC90 2005 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo XC60 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo C30 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC90 2005 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volvo XC90 2006 2.4 engine: The early versions of these engines are known for their reliability and rare failures, which made them popular.
However, engine have several common weaknesses. Intake manifold swirl flaps often seize, and ... More about Volvo XC90 2006 2.4 engine Volvo XC90 2005 2.4 engine: These diesel engines are frequently affected by intake manifold swirl flap seizures. This issue often leads to airflow disruptions and rough engine operation. The actuator for the turbocharger, which relies ... More about Volvo XC90 2005 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
| Volvo XC90 2006 is 1 cm longer than the Volvo XC90 2005, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo XC90 2006 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 249 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 613 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | 2404 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Volvo XC90 2006 has more luggage space (by 364 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 2005 (by 567 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 2006 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90 2005. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 2`735 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 4200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 9.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |