Volvo XC90 2006 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 241 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC90 engine produces 56 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volvo XC90 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC90 could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo XC90 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC90 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo XC60 | Used also on Chrysler 300C | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Volvo XC90 2006 2.4 engine: The early versions of these engines are known for their reliability and rare failures, which made them popular.
However, engine have several common weaknesses. Intake manifold swirl flaps often seize, and ... More about Volvo XC90 2006 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Volvo XC90 is smaller. Volvo XC90 is 1 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 780 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 249 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 613 litres | 780 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | 1554 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space (by 167 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 283 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 2`949 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |