Volvo XC90 2006 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC90 engine produces 12 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, but torque is 10 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Despite the higher power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC90 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC90 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC90 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo XC60 | Used also on Toyota Hilux | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Volvo XC90 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Volvo XC90 2006 2.4 engine: The early versions of these engines are known for their reliability and rare failures, which made them popular.
However, engine have several common weaknesses. Intake manifold swirl flaps often seize, and ... More about Volvo XC90 2006 2.4 engine Toyota Land Cruiser 2006 3.0 engine: The engine tends to be noisy and vibrate. Nozzle life is limited when using poor quality fuel. Increased oil consumption tends to occur over time. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.90 m | |
| Volvo XC90 is 4 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 620 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 249 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 613 litres | 620 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | no data | |
| In 5-seat version Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage space (by 7 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 8400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 9.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |