Volvo XC90 2006 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC90 engine produces 22 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 57 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 10.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC90 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC90 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volvo XC90 2006 2.4 engine: The early versions of these engines are known for their reliability and rare failures, which made them popular.
However, engine have several common weaknesses. Intake manifold swirl flaps often seize, and ... More about Volvo XC90 2006 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.90 m | |
| Volvo XC90 is 4 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 249 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 613 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 8400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 9.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |