Volvo XC90 2006 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 4.2 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Volvo XC90) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Land Rover Range Rover Sport) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 390 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC90 engine produces 205 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 227 mm (8.9 inches) | |
| Volvo XC90 2006 2.4 engine: The early versions of these engines are known for their reliability and rare failures, which made them popular.
However, engine have several common weaknesses. Intake manifold swirl flaps often seize, and ... More about Volvo XC90 2006 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 2.17 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Volvo XC90 is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 27 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 958 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 249 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 613 litres | 958 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1837 litres | 2013 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space (by 345 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Sport (by 176 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`750 kg | 3`125 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |