Volvo XC90 2006 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC90 engine produces 60 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 200 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 12.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC90 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC90 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC90 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo XC60 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Volvo XC90 2006 2.4 engine: The early versions of these engines are known for their reliability and rare failures, which made them popular.
However, engine have several common weaknesses. Intake manifold swirl flaps often seize, and ... More about Volvo XC90 2006 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Volvo XC90 is 3 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 10 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 249 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 613 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 3`175 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |