Volvo XC90 2006 vs Volvo XC90 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 2006 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC90 2006 engine produces 22 HP more power than Volvo XC90 2003, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Volvo XC90 2003. Thanks to more power Volvo XC90 2006 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 8.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC90 2003 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo XC60 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo C30 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC90 2003 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volvo XC90 2006 2.4 engine: The early versions of these engines are known for their reliability and rare failures, which made them popular.
However, engine have several common weaknesses. Intake manifold swirl flaps often seize, and ... More about Volvo XC90 2006 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
| Volvo XC90 2006 is 1 cm longer than the Volvo XC90 2003, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo XC90 2006 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 249 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 613 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | 2404 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Volvo XC90 2006 has more luggage space (by 364 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 2003 (by 567 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 2006 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90 2003. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`740 | 2`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 4200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 9.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |