Volvo XC90 2006 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC90 engine produces 10 HP more power than Volvo XC60, but torque is 20 NM less than Volvo XC60. Despite the higher power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC90 consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC90 could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC90 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Volvo XC90 2006 2.4 engine: The early versions of these engines are known for their reliability and rare failures, which made them popular.
However, engine have several common weaknesses. Intake manifold swirl flaps often seize, and ... More about Volvo XC90 2006 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Volvo XC90 is larger. Volvo XC90 is 18 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 249 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 613 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | 1455 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Volvo XC90 has more luggage space (by 118 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 382 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`740 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 9000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |