Volvo XC90 2006 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Volvo XC90) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Toyota Land Cruiser) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC90 engine produces 75 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, but torque is 23 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 10.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.2 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC90 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC90 could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC90 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.90 m | |
| Volvo XC90 is 4 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 249 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 613 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`760 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 8200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 9.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |