Volvo XC90 2006 vs Saab 9-7X 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 4.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 290 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Saab 9-7X is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC90 engine produces 52 HP less power than Saab 9-7X, whereas torque is 53 NM less than Saab 9-7X. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 13.5 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Saab 9-7X, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
| Volvo XC90 and Saab 9-7X are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 1127 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 249 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 613 litres | 1127 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | no data | |
| In 5-seat version Saab 9-7X has more luggage space (by 514 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`760 | 2`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Saab 9-7X has
| |